Skip to main content
For your codebase

AI Integration & LLM Architecture Consulting

A written AI-feature design for your next LLM build — retrieval, prompts, tool boundaries, evals, cost budget — argued out before your team commits to it.

Contact Us
Duration Engagement-based: from a 1–2 week design review to ongoing consulting alongside your delivery roadmap.
Format For your codebase
Primary deliverable AI feature design document — retrieval strategy, context assembly, prompt structure, tool and agent boundaries, and where a human stays in the loop
Best for Product and platform teams adding LLM features to an existing system, and engineering leaders who want a second senior opinion on an AI design before the team commits to it.

Pick your starting point

Outcome of this engagement

A written AI-feature design for your next LLM build — retrieval, prompts, tool boundaries, evals, cost budget — argued out before your team commits to it.

What you receive

  • AI feature design document — retrieval strategy, context assembly, prompt structure, tool and agent boundaries, and where a human stays in the loop
  • Evaluation plan — which dataset to build, which graders to write, and the regression gate that runs in CI before every prompt or model change
  • Cost and latency budget — per-request token estimate, caching and model-tiering plan, and the thresholds that should raise an alert
  • Failure-mode register — every way the feature can go wrong, the guardrail or fallback for it, and how you would notice in production
  • 90-min review session with your engineers — we walk them through the design, take their pushback, and revise before it is frozen

Is this service the right fit for you?

Book this if you…

  • You are adding an LLM feature to a product that already has real users, and the price of a wrong design is a rewrite
  • You have a prototype that demos well and fails unpredictably, and you need to know what to fix before it becomes a product commitment
  • Your team can build it — they just have not designed retrieval, evals, and failure handling for a production LLM system before

Don't book this if you…

  • You want us to write the feature — this is design and review. If you need hands on the keyboard, hire engineers; we will help you brief them
  • You want model training or ML research — our scope is product engineering on top of existing models, not building your own
  • You still need an answer to "should we do AI at all" — that is a leadership decision, not an architecture one, and it belongs in a different conversation

Why This Service

Most AI features fail in the same few places: retrieval returns the wrong context, the agent has no stopping condition, and nobody can tell whether the last prompt change made things better or worse. We help you design the feature so those failure modes are visible to you before they are visible to your users.

Key Benefits

1

Retrieval That Returns the Right Context

Chunking, indexing, ranking, and context assembly designed around your data — the part that decides answer quality before the model is even called.

2

Evaluation Before Scale-Up

An eval suite and regression guards built on your own examples, so prompt and model changes get measured instead of argued about.

3

Cost and Latency as Design Constraints

Token budgets, caching, model tiering, and streaming decided at design time — not after the first invoice decides for you.

4

Failure Modes Handled on Purpose

Hallucination surfaces, tool-call errors, timeouts, and unsafe output get explicit fallbacks and guardrails instead of a retry loop.

What This Service Includes

  • AI feature design sessions: RAG, agents, and tool-calling architecture
  • Model selection and prompt / context design review
  • Evaluation suite design: datasets, graders, regression gates in CI
  • Cost and latency budgeting: caching, batching, model tiering
  • Failure-mode and guardrail review: fallbacks, limits, data boundaries

How We Work Together

A straightforward engagement — from first call to measurable results.

1

Discovery Call

We discuss your goals, stack, and challenges. No commitment required — just a clear conversation.

2

Tailored Plan

We propose a focused engagement scope aligned with your team size, timeline, and actual needs.

3

Deliver & Follow Up

We execute the engagement and provide written findings, next steps, and optional follow-up support.

Who you'll be working with

Oleksii Anzhiiak

Oleksii Anzhiiak

Software Architect, Senior .NET Engineer & Co-Founder

Currently shipping

Currently leads architecture for ToyCRM.com — a multi-tenant CRM platform built on .NET by our team. The same patterns and design decisions used there appear directly in the courses: identity & auth, distributed services, code review culture. You learn from engineers actively shipping production code, not from a textbook.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. We design it with you and review what your team builds — architecture, evals, failure handling. Implementation stays with your engineers, because they are the ones who will operate it afterwards.

No. Model choice is a constraints problem: data boundaries, latency, cost, and the quality bar for your specific task. We help you compare the options against those constraints and keep the design portable enough to switch later.

Want to build this skill in-house instead?

Companies with engineering bandwidth sometimes prefer to upskill the team rather than buy the engagement. If that's you, here are the courses that cover the same ground — taught by our senior engineers in the same voice as our consulting work:

Read alongside this engagement

AI Features That Survive Contact with Production

Senior architecture guidance for teams shipping AI features: retrieval design, agent boundaries, model selection, evaluation strategy, and cost budgets — reviewed before they get expensive.

Read more Show less

Most AI features fail for architectural reasons, not model reasons: retrieval that returns the wrong context, agents with unbounded tool access, no evaluation harness to catch regressions, and costs that were never budgeted. Our AI integration consulting exists to catch those failures at the design stage, when they cost a meeting instead of a quarter.

We review or co-design the parts that determine whether an LLM feature ships reliably: the retrieval pipeline (chunking, indexing, ranking), prompt and context structure, tool boundaries for agents, model selection against your latency and cost constraints, and the evaluation strategy that tells you the system still works after every change.

This is architecture consulting from practitioners, not slideware. The same engineer who teaches our production LLM and agent-building courses reviews your design against real operational constraints: token budgets, failure modes, observability, and the security boundary between the model and your systems of record.

The engagement produces a written AI-feature design your team can execute: retrieval architecture, prompt and context conventions, tool-access boundaries, an evals plan, and a cost budget. Teams use it to ship the first version with confidence — or to stop a doomed approach before it burns a quarter.

What's Included

  • Retrieval pipeline design and review (RAG)
  • Agent tool boundaries and safety review
  • Model selection against latency and cost constraints
  • Evaluation (evals) strategy for non-deterministic systems
  • Token cost budgeting before launch

What You'll Achieve

  • A written AI-feature design your team can execute
  • Retrieval and context architecture that returns the right data
  • Agents with explicit, reviewable tool boundaries
  • An evals plan that catches regressions before users do
  • A cost budget the CFO can read

Ready to Get Started?

Contact us today to learn more about how this service can help you

View All Services
AI Integration & LLM Architecture Consulting