Architecture Review & Technical Due Diligence
A 30-page written report on your architecture risks — with a prioritised roadmap your team can execute in the next quarter.
Outcome of this engagement
A 30-page written report on your architecture risks — with a prioritised roadmap your team can execute in the next quarter.
What you receive
- Written architecture report (~30 pages) — system map, identified risks, prioritised recommendations, trade-off analysis
- 60-minute walkthrough call — we present findings to your team and answer questions
- Slide deck of the same findings — for sharing with stakeholders, investors, or your board
- Written summary email — a 1-page executive version of the report for non-technical readers
- Optional follow-up session 4 weeks later — review what your team executed and where to go next
Is this service the right fit for you?
Book this if you…
- You're a CTO or head of engineering with a 50k+ LoC codebase that "still works but is starting to feel slow" — and you want a senior outside opinion before the next big architecture decision
- You're raising a Series A/B and an investor or technical advisor has asked for an independent technical assessment
- You're about to scale the team 2-3× and want to know which architectural decisions to make NOW, before more engineers cement the wrong ones
Don't book this if you…
- You want us to BUILD the system — this is a review service, not a delivery one. We hand you a roadmap; your team executes it
- Your codebase is under 5k LoC — there's not enough surface area to review meaningfully. Spend the budget on building features instead
- You want validation, not feedback — if you're looking for a stamp of approval to silence a sceptic, this isn't the right engagement. We say what we actually find
Why This Service
Architecture issues rarely fail loudly — they fail through slow delivery, hidden risks, and rising costs. We provide an external, senior-level review with actionable improvements and prioritization that teams can execute.
Key Benefits
Risk & Bottleneck Identification
Find architectural risks that impact reliability, scaling, security, and delivery speed.
Actionable Architecture Roadmap
Prioritized steps with trade-offs, effort estimates, and sequencing your team can follow.
Alignment Across Stakeholders
Create a shared understanding of what to fix now vs later — and why.
Higher Confidence for Scaling
Reduce surprises during growth by validating architecture decisions early.
What This Service Includes
- Architecture and system design review (services, data, boundaries)
- Scalability, reliability, and security risk assessment
- Performance and operational bottleneck analysis
- Final report with prioritized recommendations and next steps
- Optional follow-up session to align execution plan
Who you'll be working with
Oleksii Anzhiiak
Software Architect, Senior .NET Engineer & Co-Founder
Currently leads architecture for ToyCRM.com — a multi-tenant CRM platform built on .NET by our team. The same patterns and design decisions used there appear directly in the courses: identity & auth, distributed services, code review culture. You learn from engineers actively shipping production code, not from a textbook.
Frequently Asked Questions
Want to build this skill in-house instead?
Companies with engineering bandwidth sometimes prefer to upskill the team rather than buy the engagement. If that's you, here are the courses that cover the same ground — taught by our senior engineers in the same voice as our consulting work:
Read alongside this engagement
OpenSpec in 2026: The Operating System for Spec-Driven Development
Six weeks ago I installed @fission-ai/openspec. Yesterday I shipped a 14-file change in 90 minutes from a 200-line spec, in a brownfield codebase three engineers have been editing for two years — no merge conflicts, no review escalation. This is the senior-architect deep-dive on why OpenSpec is the first SDD tool that doesn't collapse under production reality.
Evals in 2026: The Test Suite for Systems That Aren't Deterministic
Your AI feature worked yesterday and fails today. No code change, no prompt change, no model change. That's what life without evals looks like. This is the third leg of the spec → context → evals trinity — and the discipline most teams skip.
Spec-Driven Development: When Your Spec Becomes the Codebase
I haven't written a function by hand in two months — and the codebase has never been healthier. Here's how spec-driven development changed what 'engineering work' means in 2026, the rules that keep the discipline honest, and where it still falls apart.
What's Included
- Independent architecture review by our senior engineering team
- Scalability, reliability, and security analysis
- Monolith vs microservices trade-off evaluation
- Codebase, API, and database design assessment
- Production and operational risk identification
- Actionable recommendations with clear priorities
What You'll Achieve
- Identify architectural risks before they become costly
- Improve scalability and system reliability
- Reduce future technical debt
- Make informed architecture and technology decisions
- Align system design with business goals
Ready to Get Started?
Contact us today to learn more about how this service can help you