Code Review & Refactoring
A line-by-line review of your most-touched modules — with concrete refactor priorities and a written code-quality bar your team can hold the line on.
Pick your starting point
Outcome of this engagement
A line-by-line review of your most-touched modules — with concrete refactor priorities and a written code-quality bar your team can hold the line on.
What you receive
- Written code-review report — file-by-file findings, severity-tagged (critical / high / medium / nice-to-have)
- Prioritised refactor plan — sequence + effort estimate, so the team knows what to tackle first vs later
- Code-quality bar document — the standard your team will hold from now on (naming, error handling, test coverage, PR hygiene)
- 60-min walkthrough call — we go through the report with the engineering team and answer questions
- Optional pair-refactor session — we sit with a senior on your team for one 90-min session to refactor a flagged module together
Is this service the right fit for you?
Book this if you…
- You're a tech lead or engineering manager and the team's PRs are merging slower than they used to — you suspect it's code quality, not skill
- You're hiring more engineers and want a written code-quality bar BEFORE they arrive — so they don't cement bad habits as the new normal
- You inherited a codebase from a previous team and want a senior outside opinion on what's salvageable vs what should be rewritten
Don't book this if you…
- You want us to write the code instead — this is a review service. We tell you WHAT to fix; your team executes
- Your codebase is brand-new (under 2 months) — there's not enough surface area to find meaningful patterns. Wait until you have real velocity data
- You're looking for validation, not honest feedback — if "you're doing great" is the answer you want, we're not the right fit
Why This Service
Code quality issues rarely block delivery immediately — they accumulate as technical debt, slow teams down, and increase risk. We review code from a senior, production-first perspective and help teams improve without overengineering.
Key Benefits
Reduced Technical Debt
Identify and address debt that slows development and increases maintenance cost.
Improved Reliability & Performance
Detect performance bottlenecks, concurrency issues, and hidden failure points.
Better Maintainability
Make code easier to understand, modify, and extend for current and future team members.
Knowledge Transfer
We explain not just what to change, but why — helping teams grow, not just fix code.
What This Service Includes
- Detailed review of critical code paths
- Architecture, patterns, and design consistency checks
- Security, reliability, and edge-case analysis
- Refactoring recommendations with examples
- Optional follow-up Q&A session
How We Work Together
A straightforward engagement — from first call to measurable results.
Discovery Call
We discuss your goals, stack, and challenges. No commitment required — just a clear conversation.
Tailored Plan
We propose a focused engagement scope aligned with your team size, timeline, and actual needs.
Deliver & Follow Up
We execute the engagement and provide written findings, next steps, and optional follow-up support.
Who you'll be working with
Oleksii Anzhiiak
Software Architect, Senior .NET Engineer & Co-Founder
Currently leads architecture for ToyCRM.com — a multi-tenant CRM platform built on .NET by our team. The same patterns and design decisions used there appear directly in the courses: identity & auth, distributed services, code review culture. You learn from engineers actively shipping production code, not from a textbook.
Frequently Asked Questions
You can provide a Git repository (GitHub, GitLab, etc.) or a limited snapshot. We agree on scope before starting.
By default, we provide guidance and examples. Implementation support is available as a separate engagement if needed.
Want to build this skill in-house instead?
Companies with engineering bandwidth sometimes prefer to upskill the team rather than buy the engagement. If that's you, here are the courses that cover the same ground — taught by our senior engineers in the same voice as our consulting work:
Read alongside this engagement
Durable Execution for Agents: The Fifth Discipline Your .NET Background Already Prepared You For
Spec is the truth. Context is the assembly. Evals are the proof. OpenSpec is the operating system. The substrate underneath — the thing that keeps a multi-step agent alive across retries, restarts, and the human-in-the-loop who walks away from their desk at 5pm — is durable execution. Every .NET engineer who's ever shipped a MassTransit saga already understands the pattern; here's how it maps onto serious AI agents in 2026, and why it's the fifth discipline that finally closes the arc.
OpenSpec in 2026: The Operating System for Spec-Driven Development
Six weeks ago I installed @fission-ai/openspec. Yesterday I shipped a 14-file change in 90 minutes from a 200-line spec, in a brownfield codebase three engineers have been editing for two years — no merge conflicts, no review escalation. This is the senior-architect deep-dive on why OpenSpec is the first SDD tool that doesn't collapse under production reality.
Evals in 2026: The Test Suite for Systems That Aren't Deterministic
Your AI feature worked yesterday and fails today. No code change, no prompt change, no model change. That's what life without evals looks like. This is the third leg of the spec → context → evals trinity — and the discipline most teams skip.
What's Included
- Senior-level external code review
- Technical debt and risk identification
- Refactoring strategy with clear priorities
- Performance and security analysis
- Best practices and coding standards alignment
- Actionable, easy-to-follow recommendations
What You'll Achieve
- Cleaner and more maintainable codebase
- Reduced technical debt and risks
- Improved performance and reliability
- Shared engineering standards across teams
- Faster onboarding and safer changes
Ready to Get Started?
Contact us today to learn more about how this service can help you